672. Bobby, It’s Cold Outside

Original airdate: December 15, 2019

The premise: Sideshow Bob gets employed as Santa Claus at a local holiday village park. When Bart threatens to disrupt his operation, Bob tries to convince him he’s made a turn for good by helping uncover who’s been stealing packages off people’s doorsteps in the nights leading up to Christmas.

The reaction: Sideshow Bob again? Honestly and truly, does anyone really care about this character anymore? As I’ve said many times, “Brother From Another Series” was the perfect denouement for Bob, genuinely turning over a new leaf, saving his arch nemesis, but being locked up forever anyway in a cruel twist of fate. Future episodes featured him flip-flopping his unwavering vendetta toward Bart (and by extension, the rest of the Simpsons) at least two more times, by my recollection. They gave him a wife and son, who have been conspicuously absent for the last ten years. But in none of these episodes did it feel like we ever learn something new about Bob, or see a different side to his character. He’s a snooty thespian, and he wants to murder a ten-year-old. That’s about all. At the start of the show when Bob’s lighthouse neighbor asks him if he’s ever thought about children (bizarrely forward of her), Bob imagines the murdered Bart ornaments adorning his tree, the draperies of tinsel bleeding profusely. It really is genuinely upsetting when you actually think about Bob and his blood-thirsty obsession with killing a small child. This of course was all born from “Cape Feare,” which only got away with it because the episode itself was so outlandish and silly. But later episode seemed to dwell on this too much. I recall the last episode “Gone Boy” had Bob talk to a therapist about it, he ended up not murdering Bart, and then gave it up forever? I think? Whatever. So what’s happening in this show? Once we get past all the Bob bullshit, he agrees to help out with the B-plot, in finding out who’s been stealing the town’s packages. Turns out it’s Mr. Burns, who wants the town of Springfield to be as miserable on Christmas as he was as a boy. Back in 1935, he told a department store Santa the only thing he wanted this holiday season was a hug from his cold, distant parents, but all he got was shipped off to boarding school. Li’l Burns as a precocious spoiled shithead is far more in character and more amusing than the poor little rich boy to spiteful, heartless parents who are the root of his emotional abuse. What, are they trying to be like fucking BoJack Horseman? Bob poses as Santa to give Burns a quick therapy session, Burns fucking cries (ugh), and he gives the town back their gifts on Christmas morning Grinch-style. Then I wake up because the episode is almost over. And then I fast forward Bob and his lighthouse neighbor singing “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” for no reason. As I’ve said many times regarding Bob episodes, there are definitely ways you could bring him back effectively, either as a genuinely reformed member of society, or still a scheming madman. But you have to do something new and interesting with the character. We’ve seen flashes and interesting elements in the past twenty years, most notably in season 14’s “The Great Louse Detective,” where he was released from prison to find the man trying to kill Homer. In retrospect, using Bob as someone who can think like a killer for good was actually a great idea. But the episode was more interested in having multiple scenes where Bob get electrocuted over and over again. Even back then, potentially solid ideas, buried under a pile of meaningless nonsense. Same with this episode. Except for that “solid ideas” part.

Three items of note:
– It was interesting this episode regarded how the last Bob episode “Gone Boy” left off, featuring his new life living in isolation in a lighthouse. Back then, I think it was left ambiguous if he had truly escaped his Bart obsession. An elderly Bob wrote DIE BART DIE in the sand only for it to be washed away by the current, like washing his former sins away, which felt almost kind of poetic if not for my belief that I knew the next Bob episode would feature him wanting to kill Bart again. And wouldn’t you know, the first fucking scene with Bob here features him cheerily making his own Christmas ornaments of Bart getting horrifically killed. Fuck. Later, Bob has Bart in his clutches, but announces he just can’t kill him, like he did the last three or more times this happened. His excuse then was that he’s a hardcore method actor, so he couldn’t possibly harm a child as Santa Claus. I thought this would play a part in the rest of the episode, but it’s dropped immediately. So has Bob really gotten over Bart? Who knows. But more importantly, who cares?
– Following a bloody mishap with a decoy package, a seriously injured Lenny writes the initials of the package-napper in his blood: SB. Bart is adamant it’s Sideshow Bob, and after examination, the police free their other suspects: actor Scott Bakula (voicing himself), LA Clippers owner and former disgraced Microsoft CEO Steven Ballmer (also voicing himself), and Sandra Bullock, who says nothing because Sandy doesn’t need to do this bullshit. Or maybe it’s just because they wanted to do a Bird Box parody. By which she just puts a blindfold on and walks out of the scene, because that was a thing that she did in a movie that was somewhat popular in what feels like ten years ago. That, and the Simpson family singing the “Baby Shark” song, fall in the same familiar category of the show’s futile, undying attempt to directly reference modern pop culture, despite the show’s long production schedule to make any kind of specific topical humor completely pointless.
– At the end of the episode, Bob watches It’s A Wonderful Life on TV, as in the actual live-action black & white film. This has happened a couple times previously on the show, where we just randomly see the characters watching  a live action movie, and it’s always very weird. Even stranger considering Wonderful Life is owned by Paramount (I think. The film has a storied history regarding its copyright, which reading about proved far more interesting than this episode), so they would’ve had to pay for the rights to use the footage especially for this scene, which doesn’t even have a good punchline. Though I guess it’s no different when the show licenses music, I don’t know how much different in cost it would be.

One good line/moment: At Santa’s Village, Maggie is stuck on the Gnome in the Home boat ride, an incredibly traumatizing experience for infants of devious robot gnomes terrorizing the riders. The scene gets pretty over the top, but one bit involves one-eyebrowed baby Gerald getting snatched up by a gnome, who then slowly and silently recedes into the darkness, and then the scene cuts. It’s a pretty dark joke that made me chuckle in how out of left field it was.

17 thoughts on “672. Bobby, It’s Cold Outside

    1. A very interesting question.

      I know that Disney were probably unwilling to cancel The Simpsons so soon after buying out FOX because they would have been immensely criticized by those few fans who won’t admit the damn thing isn’t funny anymore. It would’ve been a PR disaster so they renewed it to satisfy those fans.

      But Disney likes money, and FOX movies haven’t been performing greatly in 2019. The Simpsons has been a loss-leader for several years at this point, but with ‘Dark Phoenix’, ‘The Art of Racing in the Rain’ and ‘Ad Astra’ underperforming greatly, Disney needs to make some profit out of their FOX deal. And what better way is there than cancelling a show that has been running for over three decades at this point?

      Plus, the show has embroiled itself in controversy recently, especially regarding the withdrawal of Stark Raving Dad, and the awful short ‘West Wing Story’ which was hated by most people on the Internet. Many people now accept that The Simpsons is not a show that belongs to modern TV, and ratings have been pretty poor recently. The Season 30 finale, ‘Crystal Blue-Haired Persuason’, attracted only 1.44 million viewers. Season 31 ratings have varied between 2 to 5.6 million (although I believe that 5.6 million episde, ‘Go Big or Go Homer’, only got good ratings because it immediately followed an American football match, which has 24.6 million viewers).

      All in all, I think Disney will not give The Simpsons a season 33, but I wouldn’t be shocked if it did.

      1. As much as it would thrill me to see somebody go above Al Jean and pull the plug, it’s not likely or possible. The show is done cheaply and has, by and large, focuses on pleasing its corporate masters contrary to what that video a few months ago may claim otherwise. Disney may not make a lot of money on this deal in the short term, particularly given the Avatar franchise money sink which will, at best, break even, but the goal was to create an oligopoly and shore up as much resources as possible for streaming, and if the Simpsons continues to burp out subpar to mediocre content throughout the 2020s, that is upwards to 10 years worth of episodes for Disney+ and syndication… remember, most places can’t just pick and choose what they want to show, so when you tune in to your local network, it’s like playing a reverse Russian Roulette; there’s a 1 in 3 chance you’ll get an episode you’ll like. They’ll make their money back with this, and if not, they at least have their Star Wars and their Marvel and their Pixar stuff to tithe them over…

        You know, a few days ago, I had to endure the (Video) Game Awards, an annual event people mostly put up with in the hopes of seeing new game announcements and hope who gets announced for the current hip fighting game, and this recent one was a desperate slog with countless Magic: the Gathering Arena commercials and “dude bro” marketing. But one of the more interesting aspects of the event was seeing Green Day perform and I realized that the 2010s was the decade Green Day finally became corporate. It is rather telling when something that you always looked at as rebellious and fighting “the Man” finally puts on a suit and tie and tells you conglomerations are friendly and that synergy is everything in today’s “consumer” marketplace, in which people are objects with money rather than… you know, human beings with thoughts and opinions. Considering how this episode leans heavily on Zombie Simpsons traits (dated pop culture references, pointless celebrity cameos, disregard for continuity, screwing with characters just to fit a narrative). Also… why, oh why, are they now showing live action footage? Showing a generic wagon hauling scene in Treehouse of Horror IV worked since it was part of the joke and was immediately sandbagged, but between this and the episode where Homer becomes Gregory Peck’s portrayal of Atticus Finch, they play these scenes straight. Once more; this is Family Guy territory of just being lazy with animation.

        As for the movie, it became popular due to the copyright being nonexistent after 1975, although technically, the musical score IS copyrighted and a 1990 court case found that the movie was derivative from a preexisting work, which is a way in which companies are able to sneak in a copyright retroactively to something that otherwise may wind up becoming known as an “orphan work” (something that exists but due to its unknown status between holders, cannot be used). The film was a notable box office flop during its run, and as a result, the film studios didn’t renew its copyright (before the Sonny Bono Act of 1999, also known derogatorily as the Mickey Mouse Protection Act, which contrary to the statement, wouldn’t make the character public domain, but just the animated movies, various media tended to have copyright periods of upwards of 56 years which was felt enough time would exist for the estate to make money off of the property, unless companies just didn’t want to renew it or erroneously failed to copyright it properly, at which case it would become public domain property quicker… on a side note, due to the Sonny Bono Act, it wasn’t until 2019 that various media finally was added to the public domain due to time), and given how there were more TV stations that existed in various markets across the country than those with “Big 3” affiliations in the 70s and 80s, they needed as much syndicated and free content to fill their airwaves. Luckily, this film managed to hit all of their guidelines, and wasn’t a bizarre film like “Santa Claus Conquers the Martians” that only fans of camp would like. Unfortunately, given how we’re in the age of streaming, it seems now more than ever copyrighted media will be claimed then later fought for perpetual copyright status (i.e. the copyright should last forever, which was what the estate of Sonny Bono argued) and it’s very unlikely anything made in the past 30-40 years will ever be in the public domain.

    2. FOX apparently figured out a long time ago that the cost of keeping the show in production is worth it for the massive windfall they get in merchandising and other tie-ins. I’m sure Disney is in no rush to disrupt that cash flow. It’s not like the show has tanked in the ratings. Their numbers aren’t great, but the majority of network shows not on CBS get shit ratings anyway.

      I feel like I’ve spent like 15 years thinking, “THIS is the last season… no, THIS is the last season…” and so on, that I really have no idea anymore. At this point, barring an extreme event like a main cast member passing away, it just seems like the show’s gonna go as long as they possibly can.

      1. And even then, I feel like the staff will just casually (or, possibly callously, depending on how you view it) replace said cast member with a bunch of other replacements. Seems like the days of just retiring old characters like Lionel Hutz/Troy McClure are long gone.

      2. Would ending the show really affect merchandise sales though?. I mean look at other iconic shows such as Friends, Seinfeld and The Office; all of which continue to generate revenue through merchandise and streaming deals despite being off the air for decades. If The Simpsons ended 10 or 15 years ago, not only would they still cash-in on merchandise, but probably more-so because of the nostalgia factor.

    3. Well this is interesting because the moment the show ends, Disney is able to renegotiate the price the show costs for syndication rights. Right now, those rights have a locked rate until the show ends. Thus, if Disney were to end the series, it means they can up the rates if they want to.

      The better question I guess is “Is it worth it to Disney to charge a higher price for other networks to air The Simpsons?”

      BTW, The Simpsons had already been renewed through Season 33 before Disney’s buyout of Fox was completed, so nothing would change until at least that one was completed.

      1. I don’t think Disney wants to syndicate The Simpsons to other networks, mainly because it’s currently syndicated on FXX and Freeform (both owned by Disney).

        And also, the show was only renewed up to Season 32. The last renewal was made in February 2019, so it probably won’t be until February 2021 that we find out whether or not the show gets renewed for Season 33.

  1. Oh, hooray, it’s Sideshow Bob! again…you’re like the Energizer Bunny, you just keep going and going and going with that HILARIOUS Bart plot that I swear ended in 1997…

    …can’t they swap him out with Sideshow Mel? At this point, he deserves revenge for being sidelined by Bob’s shit.

    1. Mel’s going to be stuck as the second banana who, like Bob, is into the finer arts and sophisticated culture of life compared to Krusty’s filthy debauchery and subscription to Gigantic Asses and that is his only character trait. I think it’s been firmly established in the past 20+ years that anyone not a Simpson isn’t going to get an episode arc developing themselves without it being hijacked about how gosh darn great the Simpson is, barring one or two episodes every 4 or 5 seasons.

    2. That problem is even more apparent in Steven Universe Future, which has less scenes without Steven than any The Simpsons episodes without the Simpsons in the past 3 seasons. Everything must revolve around Steven reacting to the gems telling him about the situation they are in and he gains new powers as the plot demands to solve that problem. He has to be in nearly every scene to fix everything, and it got to the point where the 9th SUF episode had Steven ask when something important happened with Sadie and Lars that he didn’t see.

  2. Recently I’ve begun to see the Simpsons less as a shadow of it’s former self and more as a case study. I think the Simpsons is an important lesson of what happens to a show that goes past its prime. In this way The Simpsons is interesting. When reading Mike’s reviews (since I won’t watch these episodes) I see the cracks getting bigger and spreading. His reviews have also helped me to appreciate shows that end with diginity like Seinfeld. Even though Seinfeld isn’t as funny as Classic Simpsons to me, at least we didn’t have a scene of Jerry being sexually assualted by a panda in the Zoo like Homer vs Diginity. And now that I’ve emotionally detatched myself by not watching the Simpsons classic or zombie, i’ve found a whole world of shows I would’ve never seen if I was still watching it.

    1. I also saw The Simpsons as a case study, but not in the same way you do. I made it a quest to look through all 672 episodes of all three decades (I have already seen half that many to this day) to measure what the 10 worst and best are of all 3 decades. When I can observe what works and what doesn’t in all 3 decades of The Simpsons, I can see what new episodes of The Simpsons have been successful in modern TV, and know how to write my own The Simpsons episodes to be as good as what the classic seasons have to offer.

      For example, I found A Totally Fun Thing Bart Will Never Do Again and Dark Knight Court to have really good character-driven stories with Bart that each had a good lesson at the end of them (enjoy fun moments while they last, and being a true hero is about helping people who need you and not just doing it for the glory) which they didn’t need to tell, but really benefited from the messages when they were there. I also appreciated Krusty the Clown’s twisted satire of TV recappers and cable TV that nobody watches. I’m sure you might too, if you gave that one a chance. It would be like eating green eggs and ham for the first time.

  3. “So has Bob really gotten over Bart? Who knows. But more importantly, who cares?”

    That one kid who is constantly posting super-defensive comments about how terrible we all are for not liking Zombie Simpsons probably cares. Other than that, I’d say no one.

  4. Oh my god, I actually forgot I watched this episode. Today I asked my wife, “Did we watch this year’s Simpsons Christmas episode?” And then I went here to look up the episode and was like, “Oh yeah, I remember it now.” That shows you how forgettable it was.

    There were a few jokes I liked at the time, but I can’t remember what they were now, but it did have to do with the packages getting stolen since that has happened to me before.

    Sadly though, the rest of the episode is a blur to me outside of what you talked about in the review, but I will agree that the scene with Maggie on the amusement park ride was pretty good.

  5. This episode was a little better than I expected it to be. I expected it to be better than the previous episode about Todd, and it certainly was just by having a more well-focused plot that didn’t try and fail to be emotional. I had some good laughs with Bobby, It’s Cold Outside that I didn’t think I would get.

Leave a comment